Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 9|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

This clearly communicates that the user will

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

0

好友

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

該用戶從未簽到

跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2024-3-5 17:00:47 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽
Leave this page and be redirected to Home Depot's page (obviously the intent here is to show purchase intent). By the way, the Refrigerator FAQ page lists a series of products below a sentence that explains why they are good products. However, instead of posting reviews that have no purpose other than increasing affiliate links, they list the products as "jumplinks." 3. Top Freezer Refrigerator Reviews Winner: Bellingham Electic Loser: The Wirecutter by the NY Times At first glance, the change in ranking for this keyword had no meaning. The New York Times' prestigious website is losing its ranking to a nameless, sophisticated page. National publishers lost out to local consumer electronics sites. This is why I like this example. This page from the New York Times is correct on all counts. The amount of content is sufficient and the review process is transparent.

There's even a section called "Why You Should Trust Us." The New York Times page has great content, so it remains on the first page of search results. It's probably not that the page was wrong, but that something was missing. No matter how comprehensive this page is, something Belgium Phone Number Data is missing. Before looking at the reviews on each page, let's take a look at Bellingham Electric. It's not long and it's not pretty. However, readers may find it helpful to have three pieces of advice to consider when buying a freezer. The New York Times page contains similar content. However, there is no clear section to tell readers what to consider when buying a freezer. In fact, Bellingham Electric's page has a video on how to buy a freezer. There's also a link to a downloadable checklist to help you prepare for shipping.



One thing to compare between these two pages is how they handle product reviews. On the New York Times page, specifications for home appliances are included in the article in paragraph format. On the New York Times page, each product is listed in three places. There are three places: in the first paragraph of the page, in the deeper content section (pictured above), and in the carousel that displays all the products. By the way, this page contains multiple articles all at once. It also includes information on what to write a review about, but I was a little confused about them. There was a back-and-forth in the content of the reviews and the way they were collected. Despite being listed three times on the page, product specifications are not listed.


回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

雲端vps主機|免費論壇|Archiver|手機版|Comsenz Inc.

GMT+8, 2025-2-24 11:17 , Processed in 0.459361 second(s), 23 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X2.5

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

回頂部 一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |